lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:26:46 +0100
From:	Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@...il.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Benjamin Gilbert <bgilbert@...cmu.edu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/19] crypto: proc - Fix checkpatch errors

On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 03:48, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:

>> In this case, please hold seed, tcrypt, wp512 & xcbc. I will
>> refactor them.
>
> OK.

Another workflow question:
Does LKML as a whole prefer rebased patches, patches on top of the
old one or does not one care as long as it's clear what to apply in what
order?
Or does everyone have a different opionion, in which case: What is
yours?


> Thanks for checking.

No need to thank me. You decide what goes in and I accept that.
I signed up to weworking stuff until it suits the relevant maintainer
before I cloned the repo.


Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists