[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1266664166.1820.4165.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:09:26 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Vipin Mehta <Vipin.Mehta@...eros.com>
Subject: Re: Firmware versioning best practices II
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 12:00 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> That doesn't make much sense anyway. If the firmware filename is
> foo-$APIVER-$CODEVER every code change would need a corresponding driver
> change. If it is just foo-$APIVER then the $CODEVER can be embedded in
> the firmware file and printed so you know which code you're using, but
> if it doesn't influence the API I don't see why it should be part of the
> filename?
The idea is that just like with shared libraries, you have a symlink
from the 'soname' foo-3.fw to the actual file foo-3-1.4.1.fw.
For shared libraries, it's easy to create those symlinks automatically
using ldconfig. For firmware that doesn't really work though -- since
the soname isn't encoded in the file like it is in ELF libraries.
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists