[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B801AF6.20003@canonical.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:25:10 -0800
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
To: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
CC: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] Miscellaneous functions and defines needed by AppArmor,
including the base path resolution routines.
John Johansen wrote:
> Al Viro wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 01:36:17AM -0800, john.johansen@...onical.com wrote:
>>
>>> +static int d_namespace_path(struct path *path, char *buf, int buflen,
>>> + char **name, int flags)
>>> +{
>>> + struct path root, tmp, ns_root = { };
>>> + char *res;
>>> + int deleted, connected;
>>> + int error = 0;
>>> +
>>> + read_lock(¤t->fs->lock);
>>> + root = current->fs->root;
>>> + /* released below */
>>> + path_get(&root);
>>> + read_unlock(¤t->fs->lock);
>>> +
>>> + spin_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
>>> + if (root.mnt && root.mnt->mnt_ns)
>>> + /* released below */
>>> + ns_root.mnt = mntget(root.mnt->mnt_ns->root);
>>> + if (ns_root.mnt)
>>> + /* released below */
>>> + ns_root.dentry = dget(ns_root.mnt->mnt_root);
>>> + spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
>> Junk. You might as well leave ns_root {NULL, NULL} instead of that crap.
>>
> Right, though the ns_root.mnt and ns_root.dentry are needed below to detect
> disconnected paths.
>
Well no, actually I don't need it. After looking at this again,
If struct path tmp is unmodified we hit our expected root.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists