[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100221000716.29ad3e90@schatten.dmk.lab>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 00:07:16 +0100
From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] enhance /sys/class/rfkill/<rfkill>/state interface
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:14:48 +0100
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 22:40 +0100, florian@...kler.org wrote:
> > Introduce a new state-value RFKILL_STATE_SOFT_AND_HARD_BLOCKED
> > which is returned only through the sysfs state file.
> > The other interfaces are designed so that they don't need this extra
> > state.
> >
> > This allows the sysfs to represent all possible states an rfkill
> > driver can
> > have.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
> > ---
> >
> > After stumbling over this arbitrary limitation of
> > sys/class/rfkill/*/state I
> > wondered what would hinder this patch?
>
> This is not backward compatible, so can't be done.
>
> johannes
hmm... ah, i see... if driver is in hard'n'soft-block state
an userspace program would expect to read hardblock instead of the
new hard'n'softblock-state...
now that i think of it, it even becomes obvious :)
cheers,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists