[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B80D4DB.6040204@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:38:19 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Developers <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v5 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications using
fixed port numbers
Octavian Purdila wrote:
> This patch introduces /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports which
> allows users to reserve ports for third-party applications.
>
> The reserved ports will not be used by automatic port assignments
> (e.g. when calling connect() or bind() with port number 0). Explicit
> port allocation behavior is unchanged.
>
> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@...hat.com>
> Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
My test case shows this works as expect, I mean reserving local ports.
So, for this one,
Acked-by: WANG Cong <amwang@...hat.com>
Thanks for your work!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists