[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k4u5mh9u.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:17:33 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@...ia.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"zimmermann@...s.rwth-aachen.de" <zimmermann@...s.rwth-aachen.de>,
"pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>,
"apetlund@...ula.no" <apetlund@...ula.no>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>,
"eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"Arnd.Hannemann@...s.rwth-aachen.de"
<Arnd.Hannemann@...s.rwth-aachen.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"shemminger@...tta.com" <shemminger@...tta.com>,
"william.allen.simpson@...il.com" <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>,
"damian@....rwth-aachen.de" <damian@....rwth-aachen.de>,
"ebiederm@...ssion.com" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/3] net: TCP thin-stream detection
Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@...ia.com> writes:
> If it's off by default there is no issue.
Still a sufficient large number of people might turn it on
and then the network would melt.
IMHO TCP changes with badly understood congestion behaviour
should not be merged until the necessary analysis/simulation etc.
is done.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists