[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100222172938.GF3063@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:59:38 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrea Righi <arighi@...eler.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] memcg: dirty pages accounting and limiting
infrastructure
* Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> [2010-02-22 10:58:40]:
>
> We seem to be doing same operation as existing "mem_cgroup_update_file_mapped"
> function is doing to udpate some stats. Can we just reuse that? We
> probably can create one core function which take index of stat to update
> and update_file_mapped and other variants for memcg dirty ratio can make
> use of it.
>
Good Point, it can be easily extended to be generic
> In fact instead of single function charge_dirty() accounting for
> WRITEBACK, we well as other states like UNSTABLE_NFS is not very intutive.
> May be we can have indivdual functions.
>
> mem_cgroup_update_dirty()
> mem_cgroup_update_writeback()
> mem_cgroup_update_unstable_nfs() etc.
>
Hmm.. probably yes.
--
Three Cheers,
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists