[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1266814762.6072.3.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 05:59:22 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #15192] netperf ~50% regression with 2.6.33-rc1, bisect
to 1b9508f
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 15:52 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 16:04 +0800, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 01:22 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> >
> > Yes, it should remain open. We're currently waiting for some data from
> > Lin Ming. The regression itself isn't making much sense.. a kernel with
> > NEWIDLE disabled should show the same performance, but does not.
>
> (sorry for late response, I'm just back from vacation)
>
> We finally located this to a bug in mwait based C-state entry.
> Venki's patch has fixed it.
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/78544/
>
> Venki, this is the original report,
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126441481427331&w=4
Excellent, mystery solved. (adds acpi)
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists