[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100222122354.50a85575.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:23:54 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: radeonfb backlight fix
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:19:21 +0000 (GMT) James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> A simple patch to allow radeonfb to compile if the backlight option is
> set.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c b/drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c
> index 6c37e8e..2c01726 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c
> @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static int nomtrr = 0;
> #endif
> static int force_sleep;
> static int ignore_devlist;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FB_RADEON_BACKLIGHT
> static int backlight = 1;
> #else
> static int backlight = 0;
Changelog is very poor. It doesn't tell us what the error was, nor how
the patch fixes it.
I attempted to reverse-engineer the patch but gave up.
radeonfb_bl_init() is omitted from the link if
CONFIG_FB_RADEON_BACKLIGHT=n. And this code:
if (backlight)
radeonfb_bl_init(rinfo);
will emit a call to radeonfb_bl_init() regardless of the value of
`backlight', so as far as I can tell, there will be a linkage error
with CONFIG_FB_RADEON_BACKLIGHT=n both before and after your patch.
So. Please resend, with a proper description. And a Signed-off-by: line.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists