linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/15] MTD: nand: make reads using MTD_OOB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:34:26 +0200
From:	Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alex Dubov <oakad@...oo.com>, joern <joern@...fs.org>,
	stanley.miao@...driver.com, Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/15] MTD: nand: make reads using MTD_OOB_RAW affect
 only ECC validation

On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 22:29 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: 
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 22:20 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: 
> > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > 
> > > > This changes the behavier of MTD_OOB_RAW. It used to read both OOB and data
> > > > to the data buffer, however you would still need to specify the dummy oob buffer.
> > > > 
> > > > This is only used in one place, but makes it hard to read data+oob without ECC
> > > > test, thus I removed that behavier, and fixed the user.
> > > > 
> > > > Now MTD_OOB_RAW behaves just like MTD_OOB_PLACE, but doesn't do ECC validation
> > > 
> > > Is this tested against existing user space tools like nanddump ? Can I
> > > still get the raw data from flash ?
> > 
> > Thats the point.
> > Userspace doesn't/can't use that mode.
> > It is not exposed through mtdchar.
> > Userspace reads the page, and then reads the oob.
> > 
> > It does use MTD_OOB_RAW, but without data buffer, and this path I don't
> > change.
> > 
> > The only user of this, is the nand itself, when it reads bad block
> > table.
> > 
> > I confess that I didn't run test that I ported this code correctly.
> > But I did logically verified many times that the new code works just
> > like old one.
> 
> Well, then it's about time to run the tests :)

Can this be done with nandsim?

Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/