linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] of/flattree: Make unflatten_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fa686aa41002221511r67c79534od562bef934c4d7a7@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:11:48 -0700
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, monstr@...str.eu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeremy.kerr@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] of/flattree: Make unflatten_device_tree() safe to 
	call from any arch

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:50:59 -0700 Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote:
>>
>> - If CONFIG_OF_FLATTREE is not set, then make unflatten_device_tree()
>>   an empty #define.
>
> Any reason not to make this a static inline?
>
>> +#define unflatten_device_tree() do {} while(0)
>
> static inline void unflatten_device_tree(void) {}

No reason, just wasn't thinking of that.  I've changed this.

g.

>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
> http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
>



-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/