[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100222090710.GA31357@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:07:10 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
roland@...hat.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
hjl.tools@...il.com
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/ptrace] ptrace: Add support for generic
PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET
* tip-bot for Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> Commit-ID: 2225a122ae26d542bdce523d9d87a4a7ba10e07b
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/2225a122ae26d542bdce523d9d87a4a7ba10e07b
> Author: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
> AuthorDate: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:51:00 -0800
> Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> CommitDate: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:08:33 -0800
>
> ptrace: Add support for generic PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET
FYI, this commit broke tip:master on PARISC (other architectures are fine):
kernel/built-in.o: In function `ptrace_request':
(.text.ptrace_request+0x2cc): undefined reference to `task_user_regset_view'
I'll keep them in tip:master to get them tested, but note that i cannot push
any of these patches into linux-next until this is fixed, as linux-next
requires all architectures to build, with no regard to which architectures are
tested by kernel testers in practice.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists