[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100223065953.GB32503@liondog.tnic>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:59:53 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
To: viresh kumar <viresh.linux@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: QUERY: Inclusion of header files in kernel header files
From: viresh kumar <viresh.linux@...il.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:13:35PM +0530
Hi,
> I have been through many kernel header files and have found that kernel header
> files at many places don't include other header files which they have
> dependency upon.
>
> For example:
> <linux/amba/bus.h> uses struct device and struct resource and it doesn't
> include <linux/device.h> and <linux/resource.h> header files.
>
> Now, whenever i try to include bus.h, i have to include device.h and resource.h.
>
> Is this correct approach?
>
> Again, if i include device.h and resource.h, they must be included before bus.h.
and this is the thing: all those other files which include
<linux/amba/bus.h> either include <linux/device.h> and
<linux/resource.h> directly or the last are being included indirectly
through other headers.
Baseline, struct device and struct resource's definitions have to be
available before <linux/amba/bus.h> is included. That's why you have to
include the bus.h header last.
> Now this will disturb the alphabetical ordering of including header files
> sometimes. (not in this example)
I don't think there's such thing as alphabetical header ordering and if
it were it would be rather dumb thing to do.
Hope this helps.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists