[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100223195744.GK30031@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:57:45 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, roland@...hat.com,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hjl.tools@...il.com,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next requirements (Was: Re: [tip:x86/ptrace] ptrace: Add
support for generic PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET)
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 07:52:14PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:45:52AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > The solution? Stop this anti-real-world-usage bias already. Stop pretending
> > that those cross-build results are as important as say the thousands of real
> > bugzilla entries we have. They are fine info, but the kind of priority you are
> > giving them is causing a waste of resources.
>
> Ho-hum... "Kernel won't build for several thousand boxen"... "Five lines
> contain trailing whitespace"... Yup, the latter is far higher priority,
> all right.
IOW, I'd buy that argument from somebody who didn't protect checkpatch.pl
wankers against exactly that kind of criticism.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists