[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1002231427190.8693@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:31:51 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>
cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>
Subject: Re: [regression] cpuset,mm: update tasks' mems_allowed in time
(58568d2)
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Miao Xie wrote:
> > Cpu hotplug sets top_cpuset's cpus_allowed to cpu_active_mask by default,
> > regardless of what was onlined or offlined. cpus_attach in the context of
> > your patch (in cpuset_attach()) passes cpu_possible_mask to
> > set_cpus_allowed_ptr() if the task is being attached to top_cpuset, my
> > question was why don't we pass cpu_active_mask instead? In other words, I
> > think we should do
> >
> > cpumask_copy(cpus_attach, cpu_active_mask);
> >
> > when attached to top_cpuset like my patch did.
>
> If we pass cpu_active_mask to set_cpus_allowed_ptr(), task->cpus_allowed just contains
> the online cpus. In this way, if we do cpu hotplug(such as: online some cpu), we must
> update cpus_allowed of all tasks in the top cpuset.
>
> But if we pass cpu_possible_mask, we needn't update cpus_allowed of all tasks in the
> top cpuset. And when the kernel looks for a cpu for task to run, the kernel will use
> cpu_active_mask to filter out offline cpus in task->cpus_allowed. Thus, it is safe.
>
That is terribly inconsistent between top_cpuset and all descendants; all
other cpusets require that task->cpus_allowed be a subset of
cpu_online_mask, including those descendants that allow all cpus (and all
mems).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists