lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:31:51 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>
cc:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>
Subject: Re: [regression] cpuset,mm: update tasks' mems_allowed in time
 (58568d2)

On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Miao Xie wrote:

> > Cpu hotplug sets top_cpuset's cpus_allowed to cpu_active_mask by default, 
> > regardless of what was onlined or offlined.  cpus_attach in the context of 
> > your patch (in cpuset_attach()) passes cpu_possible_mask to 
> > set_cpus_allowed_ptr() if the task is being attached to top_cpuset, my 
> > question was why don't we pass cpu_active_mask instead?  In other words, I 
> > think we should do
> > 
> > 	cpumask_copy(cpus_attach, cpu_active_mask);
> > 
> > when attached to top_cpuset like my patch did.
> 
> If we pass cpu_active_mask to set_cpus_allowed_ptr(), task->cpus_allowed just contains
> the online cpus. In this way, if we do cpu hotplug(such as: online some cpu), we must
> update cpus_allowed of all tasks in the top cpuset.
> 
> But if we pass cpu_possible_mask, we needn't update cpus_allowed of all tasks in the
> top cpuset. And when the kernel looks for a cpu for task to run, the kernel will use
> cpu_active_mask to filter out offline cpus in task->cpus_allowed. Thus, it is safe.
> 

That is terribly inconsistent between top_cpuset and all descendants; all 
other cpusets require that task->cpus_allowed be a subset of 
cpu_online_mask, including those descendants that allow all cpus (and all 
mems).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ