[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B84FF5C.5090603@siemens.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:28:44 +0100
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Kick VCPU outside PIC lock again
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 02/24/2010 12:13 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
>>>> I see. Won't we hit the same issue when we call pic functions from
>>>> atomic context during the guest entry sequence?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> If there are such call paths, for sure. What concrete path(s) do you
>>> have in mind?
>>>
>>>
>> vcpu_enter_guest() -> inject_pending_event() ->
>> kvm_cpu_{has,get}_interrupt() -> various pic functions if you're unlucky.
>
> But do they kick anyone or just check/pull information? Never saw any
> warnings during my tests last year (granted: with older -rt and kvm
> versions).
Mmh, they could if there is > 1 IRQ pending. Guess this just never
triggered in real life due to typical APIC use and low IRQ load during
PIC times in my tests.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists