| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1bf329b2b4fe8fca4f4ea16874643c11@chewa.net> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:51:44 +0100 From: Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi@...lab.net> To: andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@...il.com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: tuntap with tun_no_pi and X25 question On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:52:27 +1100, andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@...il.com> wrote: > The 0x40 and 0x60 comes from the first byte of the IP which has the > version there? Yes. > With X.25 the first byte changes depending on the call sequence, so it > cant be detected and set in the same way. Then you need to use PI. That's what it's meant for. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net http://fi.linkedin.com/in/remidenis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists