[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100224193700.GE3168@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:37:01 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
CC: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] KVM: SVM: Optimize nested svm msrpm merging
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 08:27:50PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > + static const u32 msrpm_offsets[] = {
> > + 0x0000002c, /* SYSENTER_CS */
> > +
> > + 0x00000038, /* LASTBRANCHFROMIP
> > + LASTBRANCHTOIP
> > + LASTINTFROMIP
> > + LASTINTTOIP */
> > +
> > + 0x00000820, /* STAR
> > + LSTAR
> > + CSTAR
> > + SYSCALL_MASK */
> > +
> > + 0x00000840, /* FS_BASE
> > + GS_BASE
> > + KERNEL_GS_BASE */
> > +
> > + 0xffffffff, /* End of List */
>
> Isn't there such a list around somewhere already? We really should
> only keep this list once throughout the whole code. If necessary, just
> create the list on the fly when bits get set in the msrpm.
No, the list is hardcoded in 3 functions (as parameter of
set_msr_interception). I think about a variant to do this with a single
list. Probably I create a list of MSRs and check in
set_msr_interceptionm for it.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists