[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B85878E.1010500@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:09:50 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
CC: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] KVM: SVM: Optimize nested svm msrpm merging
On 02/24/2010 10:00 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 24.02.2010, at 20:58, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>
>> On 02/24/2010 09:37 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> Isn't there such a list around somewhere already? We really should
>>>> only keep this list once throughout the whole code. If necessary, just
>>>> create the list on the fly when bits get set in the msrpm.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> No, the list is hardcoded in 3 functions (as parameter of
>>> set_msr_interception). I think about a variant to do this with a single
>>> list. Probably I create a list of MSRs and check in
>>> set_msr_interceptionm for it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Or, have set_msr_interception() create the list of offsets.
>>
> Or even better yet put the list into BSS because it should be static anyways. From that the real MSRPM and the merging function can be fed.
>
Yup.
In fact, the real MSRPM can be generated by merging the list into an
empty bitmap.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists