[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100224202031.GA26987@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:20:31 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Samu Onkalo <samu.p.onkalo@...ia.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] workqueues: change cancel_work_sync() to clear
work->data
In short: change cancel_work_sync(work) to mark this work as "never
queued" upon return.
When cancel_work_sync(work) succeeds, we know that this work can't be
queued or running, and since we own WORK_STRUCT_PENDING nobody can change
the bits in work->data under us. This means we can also clear the "cwq"
part along with _PENDING bit lockless before return, unless the work is
queued nobody can assume get_wq_data() is stable even under cwq->lock.
This change can speedup the subsequent cancel/flush requests, and as
Dmitry pointed out this simplifies the usage of work_struct's which
can be queued on different workqueues. Consider this pseudo code from
the input subsystem:
struct workqueue_struct *WQ;
struct work_struct *WORK;
for (;;) {
WQ = create_workqueue();
...
if (condition())
queue_work(WQ, WORK);
...
cancel_work_sync(WORK);
destroy_workqueue(WQ);
}
If condition() returns T and then F, cancel_work_sync() will crash the
kernel because WORK->data still points to the already destroyed workqueue.
With this patch the code like above becomes correct.
Suggested-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- wq/kernel/workqueue.c~1_CANCEL_CLEAR_WQ 2010-02-24 20:43:32.000000000 +0100
+++ wq/kernel/workqueue.c 2010-02-24 20:55:53.000000000 +0100
@@ -229,6 +229,16 @@ static inline void set_wq_data(struct wo
atomic_long_set(&work->data, new);
}
+/*
+ * Clear WORK_STRUCT_PENDING and the workqueue on which it was queued.
+ */
+static inline void clear_wq_data(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ unsigned long flags = *work_data_bits(work) &
+ (1UL << WORK_STRUCT_STATIC);
+ atomic_long_set(&work->data, flags);
+}
+
static inline
struct cpu_workqueue_struct *get_wq_data(struct work_struct *work)
{
@@ -671,7 +681,7 @@ static int __cancel_work_timer(struct wo
wait_on_work(work);
} while (unlikely(ret < 0));
- work_clear_pending(work);
+ clear_wq_data(work);
return ret;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists