linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd and xfs trees

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100224134339.da65a976.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:43:39 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>, xfs-masters@....sgi.com,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ben Myers <bpm@....com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd and xfs trees

Hi Dave,

On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:58:48 +1100 Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
>
> I was waiting for this email to come in. ;)

:-)

> Yes, that is the correct fix. Thanks for that, Stephen. Consider it:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>

Thanks for the confirmation.

> Іt would be good if you could keep it as a merge fixup - we don't
> really want to have to pull the -next NFS tree into the XFS tree or vice
> versa until one or the other is upstream....

Yep, no problem (I have a system that does that for me).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped