[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B8609CE.5000705@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:25:34 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
CC: Yuhong Bao <yuhongbao_386@...mail.com>, hancockrwd@...il.com,
david-b@...bell.net, greg@...ah.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.34] ehci-hcd: add option to enable 64-bit DMA support
On 02/25/2010 01:03 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 04:29:12 schrieb Tejun Heo:
>> Arghhh.... I hate when intel pulls this type of 'product
>> differentiation' stunts. At any rate, I'm doubtful swiotlb'ing for
>> usb2.0 would be noticeable at all.
>
> That can and should be tested.
Robert did already. Given that USB2.0 devices aren't usually used for
high-perf storage subsystem, the benefit looks marginal to me but
everyone is entitled to own opinion.
Thanks.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists