[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1267078193.6611.146.camel@tropicana>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:09:53 -0600
From: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, rostedt@...dmis.org,
k-keiichi@...jp.nec.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] perf: export some syscall metadata
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 02:52 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:00:43AM -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > You can skip the syscall metadata patches (7-11) and things will still
> > work - you'll just get syscall numbers in the output instead of the
> > nicer syscall names.
> >
> > When the event injection stuff is ready, I can re-implement those
> > patches on top of it - it shouldn't be a big deal.
>
>
> Yeah, this looks more reasonable I think. The 7th patch can still
> go on though, as it deals with syscall numbers, not yet names, so
> it's fine.
>
> Ah and I'm keeping the 12th patch too (documentation) with some
> few modifications, just to tell people syscall names are not yet
> supported.
>
> I've tested the set and played with it. It works very well.
>
> Actually this work is just amazing. It's so easy to generate
> a script for any perf.data, with the right things inside, easy
> to modify as the callbacks are intuitive.
>
> I'm pushing that right away so happily...
>
Great! Thanks for reviewing and pushing it all.
Tom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists