linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] workqueues: change cancel_work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 25 Feb 2010 01:53:49 -0800
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Samu Onkalo <samu.p.onkalo@...ia.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] workqueues: change cancel_work_sync() to clear
 work->data

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 09:20:31PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> In short: change cancel_work_sync(work) to mark this work as "never
> queued" upon return.
> 
> When cancel_work_sync(work) succeeds, we know that this work can't be
> queued or running, and since we own WORK_STRUCT_PENDING nobody can change
> the bits in work->data under us. This means we can also clear the "cwq"
> part along with _PENDING bit lockless before return, unless the work is
> queued nobody can assume get_wq_data() is stable even under cwq->lock.
> 
> This change can speedup the subsequent cancel/flush requests, and as
> Dmitry pointed out this simplifies the usage of work_struct's which
> can be queued on different workqueues. Consider this pseudo code from
> the input subsystem:
> 
> 	struct workqueue_struct *WQ;
> 	struct work_struct *WORK;
> 
> 	for (;;) {
> 		WQ = create_workqueue();
> 		...
> 		if (condition())
> 			queue_work(WQ, WORK);
> 		...
> 		cancel_work_sync(WORK);
> 		destroy_workqueue(WQ);
> 	}
> 
> If condition() returns T and then F, cancel_work_sync() will crash the
> kernel because WORK->data still points to the already destroyed workqueue.
> With this patch the code like above becomes correct.
> 

Very nice, thank you for making the change.

> Suggested-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> ---
> 
>  kernel/workqueue.c |   12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- wq/kernel/workqueue.c~1_CANCEL_CLEAR_WQ	2010-02-24 20:43:32.000000000 +0100
> +++ wq/kernel/workqueue.c	2010-02-24 20:55:53.000000000 +0100
> @@ -229,6 +229,16 @@ static inline void set_wq_data(struct wo
>  	atomic_long_set(&work->data, new);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Clear WORK_STRUCT_PENDING and the workqueue on which it was queued.
> + */
> +static inline void clear_wq_data(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags = *work_data_bits(work) &
> +				(1UL << WORK_STRUCT_STATIC);
> +	atomic_long_set(&work->data, flags);
> +}
> +
>  static inline
>  struct cpu_workqueue_struct *get_wq_data(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
> @@ -671,7 +681,7 @@ static int __cancel_work_timer(struct wo
>  		wait_on_work(work);
>  	} while (unlikely(ret < 0));
>  
> -	work_clear_pending(work);
> +	clear_wq_data(work);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> 

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/