[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100225015244.GC7491@nowhere>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:52:46 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, rostedt@...dmis.org,
k-keiichi@...jp.nec.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] perf: export some syscall metadata
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:00:43AM -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> You can skip the syscall metadata patches (7-11) and things will still
> work - you'll just get syscall numbers in the output instead of the
> nicer syscall names.
>
> When the event injection stuff is ready, I can re-implement those
> patches on top of it - it shouldn't be a big deal.
Yeah, this looks more reasonable I think. The 7th patch can still
go on though, as it deals with syscall numbers, not yet names, so
it's fine.
Ah and I'm keeping the 12th patch too (documentation) with some
few modifications, just to tell people syscall names are not yet
supported.
I've tested the set and played with it. It works very well.
Actually this work is just amazing. It's so easy to generate
a script for any perf.data, with the right things inside, easy
to modify as the callbacks are intuitive.
I'm pushing that right away so happily...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists