[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B85DCAF.5030304@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:13:03 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/35] x86: make 64 bit use early_res instead of bootmem
before slab
On 02/24/2010 06:07 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Yinghai.
>
> On 02/25/2010 08:32 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>> Kernel panic - not syncing: free_early on not reserved area: 2f80000-2f9ffff!
>>>> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.33-rc8-tip-00918-gb34d361 #159
>>>> Call Trace:
>>>> [<ffffffff815d12e2>] panic+0x84/0x147
>>>> [<ffffffff81cceecb>] free_early+0x64/0x6d
>>>> [<ffffffff81cd2231>] free_bootmem+0xc/0xe
>>>> [<ffffffff81cc1cd6>] pcpu_fc_free+0x1d/0x1f
>>>> [<ffffffff81cd6056>] pcpu_embed_first_chunk+0x13a/0x27f
>>>> [<ffffffff81cc1cd8>] ? pcpu_fc_alloc+0x0/0xac
>>>> [<ffffffff81cc1cb9>] ? pcpu_fc_free+0x0/0x1f
>>>> [<ffffffff81cc1af7>] setup_per_cpu_areas+0x82/0x239
>>>> [<ffffffff81cb5b3c>] start_kernel+0x1b8/0x43b
>>>> [<ffffffff81cb52bc>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xa7/0xab
>>>> [<ffffffff81cb53b8>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xf8/0x107
>>>>
>>>
>>> we can not handle partial free, and current only user for that is pcpu_setup...
>>
>> any plan to pcpu_setup to use slab allocation instead of bootmem?
>> that code is only one user that do partial bootmem free.
>
> The problem is that the pcpu_embed_first_chunk() allocator depends on
> having a large contiguous slab of memory to overlay the percpu
> variables and then giving back the unused parts (due to layout and
> cpu_possible_mask not being contiguous). There's no way to do partial
> alloc/free anymore?
ok, will add free_early_partial to handle it.
i got impression, when we are moving slab ealier.
you said that will check to make percpu setup to use slab allocator instead.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists