[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100225181454.GA18000@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:14:54 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -mm 0/2] umh && creds: kill sub_info->cred
(on top of kmod-replace-call_usermodehelper_pipe-with-use-of-umh-init-function-and-resolve-limit.patch)
David, all.
I was going to do some minor fixes in kmod.c, but looking at this
code I am really puzzled by subprocess_info->cred complications.
I know absoulutely nothing about creds/keys, but at first glance
this all looks completely unnecessary?
IOW, please review these 2 simple patches. And sorry, I have no
idea how to really test these changes.
In case you are not aware of recent call_usermodehelper() changes
in -mm: struct subprocess_info has the new members,
int (*init)(struct subprocess_info *info);
void (*cleanup)(struct subprocess_info *info);
void *data;
info->init() is called by ____call_usermodehelper() right before kernel_execve(),
info->cleanup() is called by call_usermodehelper_freeinfo().
info->data is obvious.
And we have the new helper, call_usermodehelper_setfns(init, cleanup, data)
which merely initializes these members.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists