[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201002252104.51187.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:04:51 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Alan Jenkins <sourcejedi.lkml@...glemail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: s2disk hang update
On Thursday 25 February 2010, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> On 2/24/10, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 24 February 2010, Alan Jenkins wrote:
...
>
> > - while (to_free_normal > 0 && to_free_highmem > 0) {
> > + while (to_free_normal > 0 || to_free_highmem > 0) {
>
> Yes, that seems to do it. No more hangs so far (and I can still
> reproduce the hang with too many applications if I un-apply the
> patch).
OK, great. Is this with or without the NOIO-enforcing patch?
> I did see a non-fatal allocation failure though, so I'm still not sure
> that the current implementation is strictly correct.
>
> This is without the patch to increase "to_free_normal". If I get the
> allocation failure again, should I try testing the "free 20% extra"
> patch?
Either that or try to increase SPARE_PAGES. That should actually work with
the last patch applied. :-)
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists