[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1267129930.10104.4.camel@ank32>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:32:10 -0800
From: Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: VMI and kmap_atomic_pte paravirt_op
Hi Ian,
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 11:52 -0800, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Hi Alok,
>
> How critical is the vmi_kmap_atomic_pte pv_mmu_op hook to VMI? Is it
> required for correct functionality or is it simply an optimisation?
>
> We think we may be able to do away with the Xen version of the hook and
> if VMI (which is deprecated) can live without it and you agree then I'll
> cook up a patch to remove it altogether.
As Jeremy suggests we will be fine with disabling high ptes for VMI.
Thanks for doing this.
Alok
>
> Thanks,
> Ian.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists