[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B85EA24.5020409@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:10:28 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Samu Onkalo <samu.p.onkalo@...ia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] workqueues: microoptimize set_wq_data()
On 02/25/2010 05:20 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> The comment correctly states that the _PENDING bit must be set and
> we even have the BUG_ON() check. But this means there is no need to
> set WORK_STRUCT_PENDING explicitely and load work_data_bits() twice,
> we can rely on WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK which contains _PENDING.
>
> Shaves 32 bytes from workqueue.o.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> ---
>
> kernel/workqueue.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> --- wq/kernel/workqueue.c~2_CLEANUP_SET_DATA 2010-02-24 20:55:53.000000000 +0100
> +++ wq/kernel/workqueue.c 2010-02-24 20:58:37.000000000 +0100
> @@ -220,12 +220,9 @@ struct cpu_workqueue_struct *wq_per_cpu(
> static inline void set_wq_data(struct work_struct *work,
> struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
> {
> - unsigned long new;
> -
> - BUG_ON(!work_pending(work));
> -
> - new = (unsigned long) cwq | (1UL << WORK_STRUCT_PENDING);
> + unsigned long new = (unsigned long)cwq;
> new |= WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK & *work_data_bits(work);
> + BUG_ON(!(new & (1UL << WORK_STRUCT_PENDING)));
> atomic_long_set(&work->data, new);
Will apply under cmwq patches for the next merge window.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists