[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1267130591.2107.16.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:43:11 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Developers <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] tcp: bugs and cleanup for 2.6.33
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 15:34 -0500, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> Redefine two TCP header functions to accept TCP header pointer.
> When subtracting, return signed int to allow error checking.
This patch only adds functions, so why do you say 'redefine'?
> These functions will be used in subsequent patches that implement
> additional features.
[...]
> +/* Length of standard options only. This could be negative. */
> +static inline int tcp_option_len_th(const struct tcphdr *th)
> +{
> + return (int)(th->doff * 4) - sizeof(*th);
> +}
I don't see the point of this cast; the left operand of the subtraction
will in any case be promoted to size_t to match the right operand.
Did you mean
return (int)(th->doff * 4 - sizeof(*th));
?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists