[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1267129706.22519.562.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:28:26 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Dario Faggioli <faggioli@...dalf.sssup.it>,
Michael Trimarchi <michael@...dence.eu.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...is.sssup.it>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <t.cucinotta@...up.it>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fabio Checconi <fabio@...dalf.sssup.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: make runtime balancing code more
EDF-friendly
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 19:56 +0100, Fabio Checconi wrote:
> + stop = move_runtime(rt_rq, iter, weight, rt_period,
> pull);
> + if (stop) {
> + raw_spin_unlock(&iter->rt_runtime_lock);
> + break;
> }
> next:
> raw_spin_unlock(&iter->rt_runtime_lock);
might as well put that:
if (stop)
break;
right after the raw_spin_unlock() that's already there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists