lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100225233250.241e7d6d@neptune.home>
Date:	Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:32:50 +0100
From:	Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>
To:	"Rick L. Vinyard Jr." <rvinyard@...nmsu.edu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, npavel@...ner.com,
	tomi.valkeinen@...ia.com, tony@...mide.com,
	FlorianSchandinat@....de, krzysztof.h1@...pl,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
	jkosina@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add sysfs support for fbdefio delay

On Thu, 25 February 2010 "Rick L. Vinyard Jr." <rvinyard@...nmsu.edu> wrote:
> This patch adds support for examining and modifying the fbdefio delay
> parameter through sysfs. It also adds two driver definable minimum
> and maximum bounds.
> 
> The default behavior is to not permit modifications if delay_max is 0,
> thus preventing modification of the delay if the driver does not
> explicitly permit modification.
> 

...

> @@ -503,6 +584,12 @@ static struct device_attribute device_attrs[] = {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT
>  	__ATTR(bl_curve, S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR, show_bl_curve, store_bl_curve),
>  #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FB_DEFERRED_IO
> +	__ATTR(defio_delay, S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR,
> +	       show_defio_delay, store_defio_delay),
> +	__ATTR(defio_delay_min, S_IRUGO, show_defio_delay_min, NULL),
> +	__ATTR(defio_delay_max, S_IRUGO, show_defio_delay_max, NULL),
> +#endif
>  };
>  
>  int fb_init_device(struct fb_info *fb_info)

Would it be reasonable to add these attributes in
fb_deferred_io_init() and remove them in fb_deferred_io_cleanup()?
This would also make it possible to add write permission to delay
attribute only when it effectively can be modified.

IMHO having only attributes pertinent to the features supported by the
framebuffer is better than having all the possible ones and those of
unsupported features returning -ENODEV.

Bruno
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ