[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1267069164.30508.7.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:39:24 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/06] kernel.h hexdump cleanup
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 18:16 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Avoiding bisection-bustage is hardly a priority any more, but
> let's not break bisection this time if we can avoid it.
I think that kernel.h could use a lot more cleaning than this.
Separating it into multiple pieces is OK, but moving
stuff around to categorize it a bit better is also useful.
I've tried both ways.
Doing it all as one patchset / git commit would be best.
Here's a link to the last time I tried as a 14 patch block
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/67829/
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/16/77
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists