linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip 4/5] tracing: return accurate value for print_graph

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100225041835.GF7491@nowhere>
Date:	Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:18:36 +0100
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Wenji Huang <wenji.huang@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 4/5] tracing: return accurate value for
	print_graph_prologue

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 03:40:25PM +0800, Wenji Huang wrote:
> Return TRACE_TYPE_HANDLED instead of zero to avoid confusion.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wenji Huang <wenji.huang@...cle.com>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
> index 112561d..bd0bdeb 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
> @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ print_graph_prologue(struct trace_iterator *iter, struct trace_seq *s,
>  			return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
>  	}
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	return TRACE_TYPE_HANDLED;


Actually TRACE_TYPE_HANDLED = 1
So print_graph_prologue always returns 0.
And the check is inverted everywhere:

	if (print_graph_prologue(...))
		return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;

Which means we never it fails.

It's not a big deal because there will always be something
else to print after the prologue, and this will fail too
and then return the error.

But still, if you fix this, you also need to do:

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
index 616b135..9da6487 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
@@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ print_graph_entry(struct ftrace_graph_ent_entry *field, struct trace_seq *s,
 	static enum print_line_t ret;
 	int cpu = iter->cpu;
 
-	if (print_graph_prologue(iter, s, TRACE_GRAPH_ENT, call->func))
+	if (!print_graph_prologue(iter, s, TRACE_GRAPH_ENT, call->func))
 		return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
 
 	leaf_ret = get_return_for_leaf(iter, field);
@@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ print_graph_return(struct ftrace_graph_ret *trace, struct trace_seq *s,
 		*depth = trace->depth - 1;
 	}
 
-	if (print_graph_prologue(iter, s, 0, 0))
+	if (!print_graph_prologue(iter, s, 0, 0))
 		return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
 
 	/* Overhead */
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ print_graph_comment(struct trace_seq *s,  struct trace_entry *ent,
 	if (data)
 		depth = per_cpu_ptr(data->cpu_data, iter->cpu)->depth;
 
-	if (print_graph_prologue(iter, s, 0, 0))
+	if (!print_graph_prologue(iter, s, 0, 0))
 		return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
 
 	/* No overhead */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/