[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a8e1da1002260155l5e75a473oca5649ab33cce124@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:55:14 +0800
From: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/07] kernel.h string cleanup
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 15:33 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>> It will be better to move some of them to proper place instead of kernel.h
>
> Perhaps you could describe some of the reasons why
> it's better to move them.
>
> Maybe you could post the results of a timed compile
> comparison with kernel.h broken into multiple pieces
> while you're at it.
>
Thanks joe.
Spliting is necessary from my point of view.
It will be more clean to put externs/declarations to their own header files.
At the same time compiling time benifits as well.
printk/panic/string/trace header are splited then included by kernel.h so
just hexdump/int_sqrt are actually seperated.
fresh boot and same .config, make without -j, test result as following:
with the patches applied:
time:
real 15m16.504s
user 12m51.866s
sys 1m39.700s
vmlinux .text size: 003bfcd2
without the patches applied*
time:
real 15m20.518s
user 12m54.120s
sys 1m40.190s
vmlinux .text size: 003bfcea
--
Regards
dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists