linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86-32: improve atomic64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100226101423.GA25641@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:14:23 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Luca Barbieri <luca@...a-barbieri.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86-32: improve atomic64_t functions (v2)


* Luca Barbieri <luca@...a-barbieri.com> wrote:

> > I wonder if I could ask you to recreate your patchset on top of the
> > x86/asm branch in the -tip tree.
> 
> Done, resent.

FYI, it triggered build failures in -tip testing:

lib/atomic64_test.c: In function 'test_atomic64':
lib/atomic64_test.c:116: error: implicit declaration of function 'atomic64_dec_if_positive'

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/