[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100226114136.GA16335@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:41:36 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, haicheng.li@...el.com,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [4/4] SLAB: Fix node add timer race in cache_reap
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:30:26PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> > I don't see how memory hotadd with a new node being onlined could have
> > worked fine before since slab lacked any memory hotplug notifier until
> > Andi just added it.
>
> AFAICR The cpu notifier took on that role in the past.
The problem is that slab already allocates inside the notifier
and then some state wasn't set up.
> If what you say is true then memory hotplug has never worked before.
> Kamesan?
Memory hotplug with node add never quite worked on x86 before,
for various reasons not related to slab.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists