[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1267187000-18791-9-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:22:45 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org,
awalls@...ix.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com, avi@...hat.com,
johannes@...solutions.net, andi@...stfloor.org, oleg@...hat.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 08/43] workqueue: change cancel_work_sync() to clear work->data
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
In short: change cancel_work_sync(work) to mark this work as "never
queued" upon return.
When cancel_work_sync(work) succeeds, we know that this work can't be
queued or running, and since we own WORK_STRUCT_PENDING nobody can change
the bits in work->data under us. This means we can also clear the "cwq"
part along with _PENDING bit lockless before return, unless the work is
queued nobody can assume get_wq_data() is stable even under cwq->lock.
This change can speedup the subsequent cancel/flush requests, and as
Dmitry pointed out this simplifies the usage of work_struct's which
can be queued on different workqueues. Consider this pseudo code from
the input subsystem:
struct workqueue_struct *WQ;
struct work_struct *WORK;
for (;;) {
WQ = create_workqueue();
...
if (condition())
queue_work(WQ, WORK);
...
cancel_work_sync(WORK);
destroy_workqueue(WQ);
}
If condition() returns T and then F, cancel_work_sync() will crash the
kernel because WORK->data still points to the already destroyed workqueue.
With this patch the code like above becomes correct.
Suggested-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index dee4865..f7a914f 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -229,6 +229,16 @@ static inline void set_wq_data(struct work_struct *work,
atomic_long_set(&work->data, new);
}
+/*
+ * Clear WORK_STRUCT_PENDING and the workqueue on which it was queued.
+ */
+static inline void clear_wq_data(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ unsigned long flags = *work_data_bits(work) &
+ (1UL << WORK_STRUCT_STATIC);
+ atomic_long_set(&work->data, flags);
+}
+
static inline
struct cpu_workqueue_struct *get_wq_data(struct work_struct *work)
{
@@ -671,7 +681,7 @@ static int __cancel_work_timer(struct work_struct *work,
wait_on_work(work);
} while (unlikely(ret < 0));
- work_clear_pending(work);
+ clear_wq_data(work);
return ret;
}
--
1.6.4.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists