[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B88097E.7010608@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:48:46 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
CC: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add optimized popcnt variants
On 02/25/2010 11:47 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> Date: Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 09:27:25PM -0800
>
>> OK, this patch looks pretty good now, but I'm completely lost as to
>> what the baseline of this patch is supposed to be.
>
> Yeah, this is based on PeterZ's http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/4/119
>
> But I'm not sure which tree has it...
>
Looks like -mm, which really means that either Andrew has to take your
patch, too, or we have to wait until that is upstream until we can merge
your patch.
I'm a little nervous about just acking the patch and telling Andrew to
test it, because I don't know what the fallout would look like. I'm
particularly concerned about gcc version dependencies.
I guess, on the other hand, if it ends up not getting merged until .35
it's not a huge deal either.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists