[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B881291.3040903@am.sony.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:27:29 -0800
From: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: "Bird, Tim" <Timothy.Bird@...sony.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: add tracing_thresh support to function_graph
tracer (v3)
On 02/25/2010 06:46 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 03:36:43PM -0800, Tim Bird wrote:
>> Add support for tracing_thresh to the function_graph tracer. This
>> version of this feature isolates the checks into new entry and
>> return functions, to avoid adding more conditional code into the
>> main function_graph paths.
>>
>> Also, add support for specifying tracing_thresh on the kernel
>> command line. When used like so: "tracing_thresh=200 ftrace=function_graph"
>> this can be used to analyse system startup. It is important to disable
>> tracing soon after boot, in order to avoid losing the trace data.
>>
>> Note: the elimination of 'notrace' in the definition of '__init'
>> may be controversial. This can be removed, or made conditional,
>> if it's a bit too scary, but it worked OK for me. Tracing during
>> kernel startup still works, just with no visibility of routines
>> declared __init.
>
>
> __init functions are notrace otherwise ftrace would hot patch
> callsites of function that have disappeared.
>
> That said, tracing __init functions is indeed interesting.
> Perhaps we can handle that by removing the __init functions
> from ftrace records each time we release init pages.
Thanks. Given what Steven said about __init routines,
I'll have to think some more about this. I'm OK with
just removing that piece of the patch for now.
>
>> +static int __init set_tracing_thresh(char *str)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long threshhold;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!str)
>> + return 0;
>> + ret = strict_strtoul(str, 0, &threshhold);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return 0;
>> + tracing_thresh = threshhold * 1000;
>> + return 1;
>> +}
>> +__setup("tracing_thresh=", set_tracing_thresh);
>
> Looks like setting this, while the function graph tracer (normal
> mode) is running, will have no effect. That said it's perfectly
> fine as it would be pointless to change this value in the middle
> of the tracing.
>
The command line is parsed before the tracer is activated, so
tracing_thresh is set when trace_graph_init() is called, which
results in the desired behaviour (that is, if you specify the
tracing_thresh on the command line, you get the duration
filtering on bootup).
...
> Ok, looks good to me.
>
> Thanks.
Thanks for taking a look at it.
-- Tim
=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America
=============================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists