[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100225232840.GB24155@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:28:40 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc: rsc@...ch.com, Ashwin Ganti <ashwin.ganti@...il.com>,
ericvh@...il.com, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ron Minnich <rminnich@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] p9auth: set fsuid
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 04:44:54PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> From: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>
>
> fsuid should always trail euid changes. So p9auth should
> set fsuid as well when it sets ruid and euid. Whether the
> suid should also be set is an open question - keeping the
> old uid in suid may be useful, or may just serve to trick
> lazy userspace.
>
> Note that so long as we do not also set suid, the setuid_fixup()
> code will not (when we later switch to setresuid()) fully
> fill/clear capability sets. So while I had previously thought
> that keeping suid unchanged would be useful, I think it is
> better to change all uids.
What is your goal for the p9auth code? Currently it is deleted in
linux-next due to a lack of development. I see you have some cleanup
patches, but I can't apply them unless you get the non-staging patches
accepted.
If I bring the driver back from deletion, will you work to fix it up and
get it merged into mainline?
What's the word on the non-staging patches in this series being
accepted?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists