[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100227095115.GF31794@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:51:15 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, josh@...htriplett.org,
dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/2] rcu: fixes for RCU lockdep
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:50:18PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > This set fixes a couple of problems with the RCU-based lockdep patches:
> > >
> > > 1. Make the lockdep_rcu_dereference() message less alarmist
> > >
> > > 2. Make rcu_read_lock_sched_held() take boot-time lack of
> > > preemption into account.
> > >
> > > Thanx, Paul
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 4 +++-
> > > include/linux/rcutiny.h | 4 ----
> > > include/linux/rcutree.h | 1 -
> > > kernel/lockdep.c | 7 +++----
> > > kernel/rcupdate.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > kernel/rcutree.c | 20 --------------------
> > > 6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >
> > Applied, thanks Paul!
> >
> > Here's a new warning:
> >
> > [ 0.000000]
> > [ 0.000000] ===================================================
> > [ 0.000000] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> > [ 0.000000] ---------------------------------------------------
> > [ 0.000000] kernel/sched_fair.c:3469 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
>
> Hmmm... Could you please tell me what commit this test ran against?
One version of tip:master :-/
ob'kconfig - i think this header bit of the .config:
> > # Automatically generated make config: don't edit
> > # Linux kernel version: 2.6.33
> > # Fri Feb 26 14:51:28 2010
should contain the last-seen kernel Git sha1 as well. It would ease things
considerably.
> My guesses thus far either don't have that many lines in kernel/sched_fair.c
> or have some unrelated code at line 3469.
I'll post the sha1 next time i encounter this warning.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists