linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] fix problems with NETIF_F

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100227.015350.71138134.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 27 Feb 2010 01:53:50 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	hancockrwd@...il.com
Cc:	bzolnier@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fix problems with NETIF_F_HIGHDMA in networking
 drivers

From: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:08:04 -0600

> That seems like a reasonable approach to me. Only question is how to
> implement the check for DMA_64BIT. Can we just check page_to_phys on
> each of the pages in the skb to see if it's > 0xffffffff ? Are there
> any architectures where it's more complicated than that?

On almost every platform it's "more complicated than that".

This is the whole issue.  What matters is the final DMA address and
since we have IOMMUs and the like, it is absolutely not tenable to
solve this by checking physical address attributes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/