[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1267231138-27856-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:38:57 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcu: Make non-RCU_PROVE_LOCKING rcu_read_lock_sched_held() understand boot
Before the scheduler starts, all tasks are non-preemptible by
definition. So, during that time, rcu_read_lock_sched_held()
needs to always return "true". This patch makes that be so
for RCU_PROVE_LOCKING=n.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index fcea332..c843736 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static inline int rcu_read_lock_bh_held(void)
static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void)
{
- return preempt_count() != 0;
+ return preempt_count() != 0 || !rcu_scheduler_active;
}
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
--
1.6.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists