[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B887160.2090606@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:12:00 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Piszcz <ap@...arrain.com>
Subject: Re: EXT4 is ~2X as slow as XFS (593MB/s vs 304MB/s) for writes?
Justin Piszcz wrote:
...
>> Were the filesystems created to align with raid geometry?
> Only default options were used except the mount options. If that is the
> culprit, I have some more testing to do, thanks, will look into it.
>
>>
>> mkfs.xfs has done that forever; mkfs.ext4 only will do so (automatically)
>> with recent kernel+e2fsprogs.
> How recent?
You're recent enough. :)
mkfs.ext4 output should include the stripe info if it was found.
printf(_("Block size=%u (log=%u)\n"), fs->blocksize,
s->s_log_block_size);
printf(_("Fragment size=%u (log=%u)\n"), fs->fragsize,
s->s_log_frag_size);
printf(_("Stride=%u blocks, Stripe width=%u blocks\n"),
s->s_raid_stride, s->s_raid_stripe_width);
printf(_("%u inodes, %llu blocks\n"), s->s_inodes_count,
ext2fs_blocks_count(s));
etc.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists