linux-kernel - Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 66/66] arch/um/sys-x86_64/shared/sysdep/skas

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100228152839.GA3063@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sun, 28 Feb 2010 10:28:39 -0500
From:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
To:	Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@...ma.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 66/66]
	arch/um/sys-x86_64/shared/sysdep/skas_ptrace.h: Checkpatch cleanup

On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 03:06:21PM +0100, Andrea Gelmini wrote:
> 2010/2/27 Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>:
> Hi Jeff,
>    and thanks for your reply.
> 
> > Don't you have anything better to do with your time?
> 
> It's a dirty job, but somebody has to do it...

To be a bit more serious, the UML tree was once a seething mass of
checkpatch violations.  I cleaned up a lot of it while making other
changes in the area.  This sort of thing I think is reasonably
worthwhile, but dumping in a whole lot of checkpatch changes doesn't
help anything and it just pollutes the change history.

				Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/