lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:10:35 -0800
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why does connector use a work queue???

Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net> writes:

> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 06:57:02PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@...ssion.com) wrote:
>> These days netlink callbacks for messages happen in the context of the
>> process who sent the message.  Things like permission checks are much
>> more complicated if we don't use that process context.
>> 
>> I was looking at removing NETLINK_CB(skb).eff_cap but I discovered
>> that connected takes the netlink messages, them from their
>> perfectly good process context, and puts the into a workqueue
>> for reasons that are not apparent to me.
>
> Netlink was made synchronous rather recently and connector was not
> changed to take advantage of that. Previously it used work queue to
> postpone work processing into always-process context.

I suspected it was something like that but I want to be certain.

>> Unless I am misreading something we should just be able to remove the
>> work queues and greatly simplify the connector code.
>> 
>> Something like:
>
> Idea looks very good, thank you, but it misses structure changes
> to eliminate now unneded members.

Right. I didn't trust myself to write a patch that would rip out half
of the connector code until I understood what the constraints were.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ