[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B89E751.1060903@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 19:47:29 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, hpa@...or.com,
garyhade@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de
CC: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, iranna.ankad@...ibm.com,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, trenn@...e.de
Subject: [PATCH -v11] x86: fix out of order of gsi -- partial
From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
found IBM x3950 will have problem after
|commit b9c61b70075c87a8612624736faf4a2de5b1ed30
|
| x86/pci: update pirq_enable_irq() to setup io apic routing
The problem is that with the patch, the machine freezes when
console=ttyS0,... kernel serial parameter is passed.
It seem to freeze at DVD initialization and the whole problem seem
to be DVD/pata related, but somehow exposed through the serial
parameter.
Such apic problems can expose really weird behavior..
<6>ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x10] address[0xfecff000] gsi_base[0])
<6>IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 16, version 0, address 0xfecff000, GSI 0-2
<6>ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x0f] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[3])
<6>IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 15, version 0, address 0xfec00000, GSI 3-38
<6>ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x0e] address[0xfec01000] gsi_base[39])
<6>IOAPIC[2]: apic_id 14, version 0, address 0xfec01000, GSI 39-74
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 1 global_irq 4 dfl dfl)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 5 dfl dfl)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 3 global_irq 6 dfl dfl)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 4 global_irq 7 dfl dfl)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 6 global_irq 9 dfl dfl)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 7 global_irq 10 dfl dfl)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 8 global_irq 11 low edge)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 12 dfl dfl)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 12 global_irq 15 dfl dfl)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 13 global_irq 16 dfl dfl)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 14 global_irq 17 low edge)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 15 global_irq 18 dfl dfl)
it turns out that system have three io apic controller. but put boot ioapic
routing in second one. and that gsi_base is not 0. it is using bunch of INT_SRC_OVR...
recent changes
1. one set routing for first io apic controller
2. assume irq = gsi
will break theat system.
so try to remap those gsi, need to seperate boot_ioapic_id detection out of enable_IO_APIC
and call them early.
introduce boot_ioapic_id, and remap_ioapic_gsi...
-v2: shift gsi with delta instead of gsi_base of boot_ioapic_idx
-v3: double check with find_isa_irq_apic(0, mp_INT) to get right boot_ioapic_idx
-v4: nr_legacy_irqs
-v5: add print out for boot_ioapic_idx, and also make it could be applied for current
-v5: add print out for boot_ioapic_idx, and also make it could be applied for current
-v9: according to Eric, use fixed 16 for shifting instead of remap
-v10: still nee to touch rsparser.c
-v11: just revert back to way Eric suggest...
anyway the ioapic in first ioapic is blocked by second...
Reported-by: Iranna D Ankad <iranna.ankad@...ibm.com>
Bisected-by: Iranna D Ankad <iranna.ankad@...ibm.com>
Tested-by: Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Cc: stable@...nel.org
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 28 ++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -1465,7 +1465,7 @@ static struct {
static void __init setup_IO_APIC_irqs(void)
{
- int apic_id = 0, pin, idx, irq;
+ int apic_id, pin, idx, irq;
int notcon = 0;
struct irq_desc *desc;
struct irq_cfg *cfg;
@@ -1473,14 +1473,7 @@ static void __init setup_IO_APIC_irqs(vo
apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, KERN_DEBUG "init IO_APIC IRQs\n");
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
- if (!acpi_disabled && acpi_ioapic) {
- apic_id = mp_find_ioapic(0);
- if (apic_id < 0)
- apic_id = 0;
- }
-#endif
-
+ for (apic_id = 0; apic_id < nr_ioapics; apic_id++)
for (pin = 0; pin < nr_ioapic_registers[apic_id]; pin++) {
idx = find_irq_entry(apic_id, pin, mp_INT);
if (idx == -1) {
@@ -1502,6 +1495,9 @@ static void __init setup_IO_APIC_irqs(vo
irq = pin_2_irq(idx, apic_id, pin);
+ if ((apic_id > 0) && (irq > 16))
+ continue;
+
/*
* Skip the timer IRQ if there's a quirk handler
* installed and if it returns 1:
@@ -4061,27 +4057,23 @@ int acpi_get_override_irq(int bus_irq, i
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
void __init setup_ioapic_dest(void)
{
- int pin, ioapic = 0, irq, irq_entry;
+ int pin, ioapic, irq, irq_entry;
struct irq_desc *desc;
const struct cpumask *mask;
if (skip_ioapic_setup == 1)
return;
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
- if (!acpi_disabled && acpi_ioapic) {
- ioapic = mp_find_ioapic(0);
- if (ioapic < 0)
- ioapic = 0;
- }
-#endif
-
+ for (ioapic = 0; ioapic < nr_ioapics; ioapic++)
for (pin = 0; pin < nr_ioapic_registers[ioapic]; pin++) {
irq_entry = find_irq_entry(ioapic, pin, mp_INT);
if (irq_entry == -1)
continue;
irq = pin_2_irq(irq_entry, ioapic, pin);
+ if ((ioapic > 0) && (irq > 16))
+ continue;
+
desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists