[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100228074515.GD765@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:45:15 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/28] kgdboc,keyboard: Keyboard driver for kdb with kgdb
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 09:42:26PM -0600, Jason Wessel wrote:
> Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >
> >> The original logic for putting next to the keyboard.c was because they
> >> are both fighting for the same HW. Please let me know if this changes
> >> your mind, else I will go ahead and move the keyboard implementation
> >> into the kernel/debug/kdb.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > It does not behause in 2.6 the driver talking to the i8042 is called
> > i8042.c and it is located in drivers/input/serio.
> > drivers/char/keyboard.c does not talk directly to hardware anymore and
> > pc_keyb.c is long gone.
> >
> > Given the fact that your code does not implement a character device I do
> > not see any reason for it to live in drivers/char.
> >
>
> I buy your logic. I have moved the kdb_keyboard.c to
> kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_keyboard.c.
>
> Can I assume we have reached closure on this patch for the short term?
>
Yep.
> Eventually I would like to to get rid of kdb_keyboard.c entirely and
> replace it with some kind of way to atomically poll the input devices,
> but this is longer term.
>
I am not sure how feasible it is. KDB would require hooking very deep
into driver internals do avoid deadlocking on already held locks...
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists